Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"For self-defense in close quarters, a baseball bat is ideal."

Eh, not really. That's still a lot of unbalanced mass and potentially excessive length. There's a reason batons and other strike weapons aren't made like bats.




The best close quarter weapon, of course, is a (potentially illegally) sawed-off shotgun.

The second best is something that you've extensively practiced with, and designed for the purpose.


A gun is a terrible close quarters weapon. A gun is so good at long range that you can typically ensure you never get into a close quarters fight, but once it becomes close quarters you want something else. (with a gun you do have to keep the muzzle pointed away from you - but one hit with the bat will damage the barrel enough that it isn't safe to fire)


Aren't batons made to not produce serious injury? I.e. they're meant to coerce.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: