Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

PIN+limit is still a much worse user experience than a password:

- a PIN is hard to memorize, so people are more likely to use personally-relevant or common numbers, whereas a password can be easily be both complex and memorable - it's easy to burn through even 10 login attempts through any combination of temporary/permanent disability, stress, being drunk, damaged device... - a wipe-after-failed-attempts system is trivial to abuse, be it by a prankster or a real adversary - it's much easier to see someone's PIN over their shoulder or film them entering it




PINs can include all characters just like a password. They're called PINs for historical reasons.

(This does depend on the specific key/protocol.)


Great, so we are back to passwords then


No, because passwords are just something-you-know (one factor) while a passkey that’s protected with a password is both something-you-have and something-you-know (two factors)


So like a password manager?


No, because a password manager still just stores passwords (one factor!); if someone got that password they can get in

The whole point of a passkey is that it’s something you have, not know:

- you can’t guess it because it’s a really long encryption key

- you can’t phish it because using a passkey does not give the passkey to the site, it just proves that you have the key (typical priv/pub key auth)

- you can’t steal it because passkeys are meant to never be moved from the device — it’s supposed to be impossible to extract them, as they’re supposed to live on a secure enclave type chip that is impossible to extract from

So, no, not like a password manager




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: