I fully agree that some of the issues (like poor RLS tooling) doesn't necessarily fall on Supabase's shoulders. But this is the path that Supabase strongly recommends.

So you kind of can't have it both ways and say "Supabase is just Postgres" but then say "this is not our problem, it's postgres", right?

I actually think Supabase is in a GREAT position to actually build some of this missing tooling. They're probably now the single largest beneficiary of more people using RLS.

So I do think they will tackle this problem, it is a smart team. I just think that because of these issues, as a cohesive platform, it definitely doesn't feel fully baked (or "generally available" status) yet.