This seems interesting for bpf programs that have essentially no user-space interaction which isn’t true for any of the things it lists on the landing page. Pixie, Cilium, Parca, etc have complex interactions between userspace and the bpf program, from loading and configuring to ongoing maintenance of bpf maps. I don’t really see why they would use this. I do like this type of thing for small programs like Inspektor Gadget does, but Inspektor Gadget already exists.

I guess this is feedback to maintainers of the project to clarify these two relationships.