> Except most reviews find the fov and resolution inadequate for desktop work
I have not heard any such complaints.
Sure, I heard some complaining that the FOV should be wider, but not being able to work because of it? Not a peep.
The resolution is incredible, you can't see any pixels at all. There's zero screen door effect.
If the concern is with the Mac Virtual Display, then it's understandable. There seems to be some compression going on and it doesn't look as crisp.
Native apps though? They are perfect
> eschewing gamers
They are not doing that. It's the companies not porting games over (the ones that don't have issues with the lack of controllers). It may be simply a matter of time, as just porting games and keeping existing assets will make them look terrible with the higher resolution of the Vision Pro.
The article explains that you can’t see the pixels because the AVP is purposely blurring them. The effective resolution of a mirrored Mac screen is below that of a physical 4K screen.
I have not heard any such complaints.
Sure, I heard some complaining that the FOV should be wider, but not being able to work because of it? Not a peep.
The resolution is incredible, you can't see any pixels at all. There's zero screen door effect.
If the concern is with the Mac Virtual Display, then it's understandable. There seems to be some compression going on and it doesn't look as crisp.
Native apps though? They are perfect
> eschewing gamers
They are not doing that. It's the companies not porting games over (the ones that don't have issues with the lack of controllers). It may be simply a matter of time, as just porting games and keeping existing assets will make them look terrible with the higher resolution of the Vision Pro.