Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Occam's razor says you should not multiple entities beyond what is necessary.

Our scenario is this: There's a guy in a vehicle. He is holding a gun. He has a gunshot wound. He has been under a lot of stress.

Explanation 1: The guy shot himself. Number of entities (people) required: 1

Explanation 2: Someone else shot the guy and staged the scene to look like a suicide. Number of entities (people) required: 2

Occam's razor says suicide is the most likely explanation



Source on Occam's razor being anything more than a philosophical framework? Kind of silly to even bring that up in this scenario without looking at the possible motivations or lack thereof.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/boeing-whistleblower-wa...


None. Did I imply that it’s something else?


I would agree, except it is not some random average guy in a vehicle.

This was a concern citizen, who was a whistleblower against his employer, who had just begun a legal deposition, and there are billions of dollars at stake.

So - the scenario possibly just isn't that simple.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: