Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Better monitor, better speakers (much better in both cases), HDMI, SD. Fan, meaning less throttling on heavy workloads. Support for high-resolution and multimonitor setups. If any of these are attractive, you get the Pro.

Apple's "Pro" branding has become increasingly meaningless but in the MacBook category, which I believe is where it originated, it's meant to suggest "media professional", a demographic which has reason to care about all of these things.

There are even shades of this in the iPhone and iPads Pro, which have a few features which are mainly of interest to professional media types. For AirPods it just means "the expensive ones", and for Vision Pro it means "this is expensive". That's the main signal for phones and tablets as well, realistically.



I think the parent meant the opposite: why buy an Air and not Pro?


They're cheaper for the same internal specs, so you save money if the extras you get with the Pro aren't compelling.


exactly, outside of pricing. I see people say Air is noticably lighter, but I may then have a heavy hand because 13 air and 14 feel almost the same in weight to me, unlike OG Air which was light and thin. Hence, why buy Air? it's not even smaller.


No noise, no dust inside, lighter.


> Fan, meaning less throttling on heavy workloads.

Surely you mean “more noise”.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: