Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You don't even need to call him to the stand, it's not some gotcha, he writes it all over the complaint itself. "AGI poses a grave threat to humanity — perhaps the greatest existential threat we face today." I highly doubt a court is going to opine about open vs closed being safer, though. The founding agreement is pretty clear that the intention was to make it open for the purpose of safety. Courts rule on if a contract was breached, not whether breaching it was a philosophy good thing.


You’re forgetting that any good lawyer would do something some random on hacker news made up to support their belief the lawsuit is about AI safety.


You're perhaps forgetting that the plaintiff here is Elon Musk, the man who was forced to buy Twitter due to not realizing that signing a legally binding contract was legally binding.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: