Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

What's bad about the sticky property?



I want a dumb document. I don't want the thing where the header gets in the way of my clicking as I scroll.


Same, I can't stand sticky headers, especially on anything involving longform text content. They also make web archiving significantly harder as scrolled screenshots cant be easily stitched together anymore to get the whole page.


Don't archive the web by taking screenshots?


What other way is as convenient and available but better? Printing as PDF doesn't save the content exactly as it's shown in the browser and a plugin I used for a while in the past was pretty unreliable.

Screenshots work on any device with a modern browser and usually I don't want to capture the entire page anyway but just specific interesting parts.



Thanks for the tip. Also I completely forgot you can screenshot specific HTML elements in the Inspect panel with a right-click and "screenshot node".


Late Edit: unfortunately Firefox' screenshot feature seems to have a maximum size, beyond which it just silently truncates the output.


I understand the sentiment but at some point you're asking for the underlying CSV file. In my opinion a little gear icon which lets you toggle sticky headers and other formatting options and downloadable data as plain text is ideal but good luck standardizing such things.


> the header gets in the way of my clicking as I scroll

Sounds like your problem are not sticky headers but the "smart" semi-sticky ones that hide or show dynamically as you change scrolling direction, hiding content in exactly the place the user is looking at.


If we get OPs dream, it wouldn't.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: