Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

He owns 100% of twitter (indirectly), there isn't any other share holder. this can't be compared to wework.



Sure, but twitter is not financialy stable and if it goes bankrupt then it's not Musk who decides what to do with a gifted x.com; it's used in a way that makes twitter the most value for the shareholders not the majority shareholeder. And as i said (with reguard to wework) if it's not gifted and with the knowledge of the abuses that a shareholder who is lending(and by lending i mean any convoluted contract that leaves Musk in control of it) a company a key asset can inflict on a company, then it's easy for minority shareholders to sue or even agencies to step in.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: