Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Did property rights at the time, given the existence of slavery, allow a person to sell themselves into slavery?

None of this shit is "obvious" without understanding a lot of legal basis. I didn't understand the legal basis until this discussion.



Patents can't sell themselves, just the same as a house or slave. I think that's consistent with their conception of property rights, which save for slavery, remains unchanged in today's society. I do wonder if you think before you post.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: