Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm curious as to why they made this document public. If I owned almost 6% of Yahoo!, I wouldn't do anything that would publicly make Yahoo! look even worse. I would discretely contact the company and have it dealt with quietly.

Additionally, why bother lying? I doubt Mr. Thompson got the job due to his 20 year old CS degree at a tiny liberal arts college.




They may look to own more of the company - but at a lower price. A story like this could cause the stock to dip - especially if seen coming from a 5.8% minority owner. A large enough stake that it looks like they are concerned, but small enough that they don't have the direct access to Yahoo! to rectify.


Going further, a dark knight takeover strategy is to quietly pool the shares that multiple companies have -> into one company that then owns a majority stake or has enough votes to exert decisions in their favor.

I'm not saying this is the intent here, but one of the first steps down the path.


This tactic will most certainly get the SEC on you. There is a reason why they (the SEC) force those who own or 'control' 5% or more of a publicly traded company to disclose that ownership or control.


you can still make money when a stock is going down - its called shorting or short selling.


Internal politics? Maybe they'd like the CEO and some directors to leave.


They might want Y! to sell chunks of it (Alibaba stake) just so the hedge fund sells their 6% out while the YHOO share price presumably jumps.

But lying about the degree, and that's easily verifiable, just doesn't look good for him.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: