That conclusion isn't rational. Neither in terms of the framing of the evidence that supports it, nor in terms of the logic that follows.
Next, I don't see how anyone can generalize these conclusions when company specifics are specific.
Last, being unemployed also eliminates the harmful externalities of the fundamental task of commuting. The only reason that managers require for RTO is that they want to see your face. The manager role exists to make human decisions as to what will be best for their specific company. As far as I know, random uncritiqued research doesn't yet manage companies.
> That conclusion isn't rational. Neither in terms of the framing of the evidence that supports it, nor in terms of the logic that follows.
Can you elaborate on what exactly isn't rational? I laid out a chain of thought that can be attacked link by link, you've just made a sweeping claim with no backing arguments.
Next, I don't see how anyone can generalize these conclusions when company specifics are specific.
Last, being unemployed also eliminates the harmful externalities of the fundamental task of commuting. The only reason that managers require for RTO is that they want to see your face. The manager role exists to make human decisions as to what will be best for their specific company. As far as I know, random uncritiqued research doesn't yet manage companies.