Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Batteries (High capacity chemical) are terrible for long term storage, namely they are toxic:

https://www.mountsinai.org/health-library/poison/dry-cell-ba... https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002805.htm https://batteryuniversity.com/article/bu-703-health-concerns...

And cannot always be easily recycled:

https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-09/Lithium-I...

In addition to general concerns about chemical availability, and processing issues.

E.g. Demand expected to outstrip supply as soon as next year:

https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insight...




There's also various schemes to use gravity. Pump water uphill above a dam when power demand is low like at night, also I have read speculation of trying to do this in some underground mine or something so it doesn't evaporate.


That has even a worse energy density and thus requires a lot of space.

We have nuclear energy, we don’t need to use technology from the medieval ages.


"Batteries are terrible for long term storage, namely they are toxic"

Only some are toxic. But can you name the poison or danger with saltwater batteries?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium-ion_battery


Yes, there are excellent non-"battery" technologies. I'm explicitly talking about the high capacity chemical batteries everyone's crazy for these days.


Sodium ion batteries are chemical and can have as much capacity as you like. They just need a bit more space, but not too much more, as they are already used in cheaper electric cars.

"Chinese automaker Yiwei debuted the first sodium-ion battery-powered car in 2023. It uses JAC Group’s UE module technology, which is similar to CATL's cell-to-pack design.[82] The car has a 23.2 kWh battery pack with a CLTC range of 230 kilometres (140 mi)."

And for grid storage, "slightly bigger size" really doesn't matter.


A nuclear reaction has a factor of one million more energy per Mol as compared to chemical reactions.

Why would want to build an enery system on low-energy-density technology?

That would be equivalent to using relays for building computers in 2024.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: