You had no issue with the shift quality inspection mention until the sanctity of the assembling unions were questioned, then magically your argument appears. Your aim is transparent. We know why you didn't attack the quality inspection number argument, even though it's the parent generalized counter to your position.
Dude, it would be far less embarrassing to admit you were being provocative and drop it than spiraling into the ground like this.
I don’t know why you’re so confidently wrong about my position on quality control but it’s irrelevant to the simple fact that all of the failures we’ve seen are the responsibility of Boeing’s management: even if the unionized assembly workers are caricatures straight out of union-busting propaganda, aerospace safety is famously based on the principle of not relying on a single safety mechanism, but in these reports we’re seeing systemic failures where cost savings was prioritized over safety.
What do unions have to do with this at all if it was spirit aero systems fucking it up?
Also from what I've seen the Boeing union has been raising alarm bells about... Literally exactly all of these little things that caused the quality issues
You're saying "we know" like a single person has agreed with your line of reasoning in this thread
Touch grass bruh. No idea what's got you so frothed up, but it's not constructive.
