I always find it incredible what just a few short years of rationing during WW2 did to British cuisine for decades after. It was as extravagant and flavourful for the middle and upper classes of the 19th century and prior as any other culture. Just looking at a few menus from the period, they were decadent to the extreme and could hold a candle to the cuisines world over.
The UK started rationing in 1939 and finished in 1954. In that time, the tastes of the nations changed to the extent that we still feel that impact today, with the fondness for beans on toast and other beige foods. Think about how many times we've all heard the running joke that Brits have poor taste and don't season their food. It's sad really.
Egg a la Argenteuil, "Chicken Maryland", mutton, galantine... there's a lot of items, and that's just what's available at lunch.
It's actually not heavily spiced. That was a medieval fashion which kinda drifted out once the spices became more available. That's when spices got moved mostly to desserts.
The 19th century cuisine is much more like what we think of as French cuisine today. But in fact, the French got it from the English, and the English re-imported it to give things a "gourmet" air.
The third class menu, on the other hand, basically serves slop for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Anyone up for some rice soup and boiled potatoes? If you look at the bottom left, you'll see gruel listed. Actual gruel.
I'm not sure what they're talking about here aside from dishonest snarkiness. The menu for third class isn't half bad at all, and absolutely far from slop unless breakfast items like fresh bread and butter with marmelade can be called "slop". By the standards of average general diets among those third class passengers, it's downright good.
The gruel thing is funny though, but then maybe at the time the word didn't have the same emotional connotations
Although they are somewhat older than the 19th century, check out novels by Georgette Heyer, if interested. The genre is Regency romance, sort of romantic (& some adventure) type of novels of 18th century England, and theyinclude a good amount of talk about the cuisine of that period.
Intriguing story of how one driven individual can have such impact. Reminded a bit of the story of Poilane - the Parisian baking family that has connections (e.g. founders having worked there) to most of the bread in the US I most enjoy eating:
It was definitely not an up & coming area in the early 70s, but inflation was part of it too - my parents bought their house with a half acre of garden in the green belt for £5000 at about the same time.
Editions of this fascinating book run from USD $100 and up. Sorely tempted but wasteful for something I’ll read only once. Certainly “The Whole Earth Catalog“ opened my eyes as a wee lad to things I never knew existed and certainly couldn’t afford.
Perhaps it's changed since, but the one in top-level comment here is the same as what's actually in the OP, does it need to be combined with anything?
I understand not liking 'the forgotten genius' (tell me who) but personally I think 'changed British food' is more interesting (and what the article is actually mostly about) than 'Alternative London', which coming to the article I don't know what means, as a Briton who lived in London for almost ten years.
So a wealthy anarchist and socialist who also was a dreamer and a poet while also being a capitalist who fought the system and an adventurer. Quite a lot of facets.
> Unlike many in his scene, Saunders was not a leftist. He had no time for welfarism or state ownership, which he dismissed as inefficient, yet he also rejected rampant capitalism, which he saw as fundamentally unfair.
Not sure TFA supports your assertion that he was a socialist.
I agree with you that the article doesn't support that claim, but many socialists I know would also "have no time for welfarism or state ownership" - with some opposing the mere existence of a state - so it also doesn't really support the claim he wasn't "leftist" either.
The principles for Neals Yard regarding worker involvement, favouring encouraging and supporting workers expanding businesses by starting their own offshoots, and his practice of giving away businesses does smell lightly of something close-ish to socialism, though perhaps closer to the kind of Owens and Fourier, that Marx came to describe as "utopian" for their failure to provide any answers for society-wide structural change, than any more modern version.
As another comments pointed out, this article is peak Guardian - favouring small businesses and artisanal products over mass production, and countering extremes of capitalism in eccentric small scale ways, while at no point favouring anything to effect actual lasting change in any way that might threaten anyone with money.
The Guardian boosting the public school-educated son of a neoliberal economist and supporter of eugenics, whose most lasting achievements seem to be artisanal coffee, cheese, and cosmetics empires that serve very comfortable middle class people, is the most Guardian thing ever.
The only part about the father in the entire article was a touching vignette about how Saunder’s dad would go above and beyond to answer his son’s questions.
Did something in the article or Saunders’ life point to him being neoliberal or into eugenics?
Your comment is strange; I assume you would not like it if people applied the sins of your father to you. If anything, the fact that Saunders turned out the way he did despite his father should be a cause for celebration.
Your comment made me sad that you thought a clearly positive-sum person’s life story could be summed up so pithely.
Being public school educated and coming from the sort of family that implies - one of corrupt and disproportionate power - definitely makes your story much less inspiring. That's a lot of cultural capital, connections and financial support that most people can't dream of. Really undermines the whole life lesson about the power of counter culture.
I'm not sure I'd call the story inspiring, but it's certainly _interesting_. Public school or no public school, it is very unusual for someone to change a country's culture so dramatically, seemingly largely by accident (or at least you don't get the impression from the article that he _set out_ to change the mainstream culture).
> undermines the whole life lesson about the power of counter culture
The big 'life lesson' you learn if you study counterculture is that pretty much every big counterculture figure was a 'trustafarian' or from - at the very least - a tidy upper-ish middle class family.
I guess the point of the parent comment is that the way Saunders turned out - closing his store after a newspaper report about it, because normal customers are killing the vibe - is because of his father.
(I don't know anything about his father. If anything, he might have been more egalitarian, after all neoliberal economics is about businesses serving everyone.)
And yeah, it is a wonderful story despite that. Comments don't have to sum up the story.
This is the _Nicholas_ behind Neal’s Yard Dairy, there’s no Neal (it’s named for Neal’s Yard which is off Neal Street in London, named for Thomas Neale, a 17th century property developer).
Quite a guy indeed, and a great read, it's a little tangential though good enough excuse to mention https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation a co-op since 1955 and with an equally inspiring story of what can success can look like.
The UK started rationing in 1939 and finished in 1954. In that time, the tastes of the nations changed to the extent that we still feel that impact today, with the fondness for beans on toast and other beige foods. Think about how many times we've all heard the running joke that Brits have poor taste and don't season their food. It's sad really.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationing_in_the_United_Kingdo...