To be fair, the term "world model" does not presume scientific understanding, fa... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		gillesjacobs on Jan 7, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Chess-GPT's Internal World Model To be fair, the term "world model" does not presume scientific understanding, factfullness or causality. In an ideal AI model this would be the aim though.

mjburgess on Jan 7, 2024 [–]

Then it isnt a model of the world.

If the term, "effect model" were used there would be zero debate. Of course NNs model the effects of sentiment.

The debate is that AI hype artists don't merely claim to model effects in constrained domains.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact