its probably not that deep, the SEC probably doesn't care or didn't find anything in their purview
fraudulent insider trading requires the trader to have a contract from the company about not disclosing, a terrorist attack doesn't involve that, there are plenty of times when you can trade on non public information. its meant other things before the courts have just narrowed it over and over again
fraudulent insider trading requires the trader to have a contract from the company about not disclosing, a terrorist attack doesn't involve that, there are plenty of times when you can trade on non public information. its meant other things before the courts have just narrowed it over and over again