Why is it such a "pattern" in these brain-computer papers that the authors keep making wild clickbait claims. Last year it was the DishBrain paper, which caused a lot of reactions, as it referred to the tiny system as "sentient" (https://hal.science/hal-04012408)
This year it is the "Brainoware" which is claimed to do speech recognition , and now this.
This year it is the "Brainoware" which is claimed to do speech recognition , and now this.