I'm not quite sure I'm following you. You don't need the sound to break the wate...

SiVal on April 20, 2012 | parent | context | favorite | on: Amazing optical illusion or "glitch in the Matrix"...

I'm not quite sure I'm following you. You don't need the sound to break the water into drops. You can do it without the sound by just adjusting the flow rate. I've done this.

Are you just saying that by using sound, you can break up an even faster stream, one that would ordinarily be too fast to break up on its own?

thatjoshguy on April 20, 2012 [–]

With sound, you can break the stream into the same pattern of drop every time