> And he clearly doesn't reference the article with the hook 'problem', he keeps it generic: "(the girl selling and the guy buying)"
They are clearly responding to the article, which is about fraudulent use of the chat feature to extract money from men. It's not about selling pictures or videos.
You seem to be taking all of this as a personal attack on your choice of entertainment, or to create division in the thread.
FWIW, OP posted a comment on a message board for said article. Per my reading, they seem to be talking generally about sex work rather than the specific sex-work-fraud as mentioned in the article. Surely the comment is at least vague enough that it could be taken either way.
Do you think its normal in our society to state publicly that you think onlyfans is okay/good?
Of course not. We are not a open society.
And he clearly doesn't reference the article with the hook 'problem', he keeps it generic: "(the girl selling and the guy buying)"
Onlyfans is obvously satisfying a fantasy. This has very little to do with real life.
And when you actually buy a private video, its not some dude pretending to chat in the name of the woman, its the woman making that video.