I am not. I speak from vast experience of trying multiple approaches.
Maybe English is the first language wherever you live. That’s not the case for the majority of the world. Even if my friends and I have a good grasp of the English language, switching mid-sentence causes a delay in understanding. It’s not just “raven with a y instead of an e”¹ but “raven, as in <raven in my language>², but with a y³ instead of an e”, which is several transformations to do. I guarantee that would need to be repeated multiple times, with the other person having to take out their phone and asking questions in the midst of typing, and I’d still have to check and they’d have it wrong first time.
¹ And you’re ignoring the part of “then the letters O and S, without spaces”.
² Which itself causes complications, because most people will recognise “crow” as a translation but we don’t make a distinction for “raven” so it’s a word even people with an understanding on English may not recognise.
³ Which is a letter we don‘t use in any native word.
We can agree to disagree. By your logic every small open source project needs to hire a marketing firm to ensure their naming convention is easy to understand and inoffensive in every language on the planet. I think that’s overboard.
The project is clearly being built by someone that speaks English and is targeting English speakers. Notice their website and documentation is all in English?
> By your logic every small open source project needs to hire a marketing firm to ensure their naming convention is easy to understand and inoffensive in every language on the planet.
>I guarantee that would need to be repeated multiple times, with the other person having to take out their phone and asking questions in the midst of typing, and I’d still have to check and they’d have it wrong first time.
Definitely not. I'd just tell the raven os and let them google it. Google would find it anyway.
Which I know you didn't even try before writing this italics laden diatribe because the bigger issue is that the name is already taken (albeit abandoned).
Definitely yes. Again, speaking from experience. Yours may be different, but don’t discount mine.
> I'd just tell the raven os and let them google it.
You missed the point entirely. With each step they have to do, you lose someone. The point is to reduce friction so there is a better chance the other person follows the recommendation. You don’t seem to care if the other person ends up searching for or finding the right thing, in which case you’re irrelevant to the point. The conversation is about people trying to maximise success of a recommendation being acted upon.
> Google would find it anyway.
You seem to be unaware, but Google shows different results to different people. All it shows me for several results is a movie called “ravenous”. To other people it shown multiple unrelated projects. At this point you’ve already lost several people.
Yes, I did. And I didn’t get what I was looking for. I was expecting to get at least the web browser but even that did not show up. Please don’t assume you know what other people do or do not do.
> because the bigger issue is that the name is already taken
No, that is not an issue at all. No one made them choose “raven”, a name already in use by multiple projects. The solution to “this name already exists” isn’t “let’s replace a letter”.
> before writing this italics laden diatribe
You appear to be irrationally angry about this matter. It’s just an internet conversation about naming, it’s not worth raising your blood pressure for. I wish you a calm weekend.
> You appear to be irrationally angry about this matter. It’s just an internet conversation about naming, it’s not worth raising your blood pressure for. I wish you a calm weekend.
Actually my impartial arbiter chatgpt says you're frustrated and annoyed. Always weird when people go straight into projection.
> Yes, I did. And I didn’t get what I was looking for. I was expecting to get at least the web browser but even that did not show up. Please don’t assume you know what other people do or do not do.
Please don't go on the internet and just tell lies.
> No, that is not an issue at all. No one made them choose “raven”, a name already in use by multiple projects. The solution to “this name already exists” isn’t “let’s replace a letter”.
This point was in agreement with you that their name was a poor choice. They should have chosen something else given this was already taken, for the exact same kind of thing no less. If you were less mad you might have realized that.
I am not. I speak from vast experience of trying multiple approaches.
Maybe English is the first language wherever you live. That’s not the case for the majority of the world. Even if my friends and I have a good grasp of the English language, switching mid-sentence causes a delay in understanding. It’s not just “raven with a y instead of an e”¹ but “raven, as in <raven in my language>², but with a y³ instead of an e”, which is several transformations to do. I guarantee that would need to be repeated multiple times, with the other person having to take out their phone and asking questions in the midst of typing, and I’d still have to check and they’d have it wrong first time.
¹ And you’re ignoring the part of “then the letters O and S, without spaces”.
² Which itself causes complications, because most people will recognise “crow” as a translation but we don’t make a distinction for “raven” so it’s a word even people with an understanding on English may not recognise.
³ Which is a letter we don‘t use in any native word.