Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

815 Kg curb weight, aluminum chassis. It makes sense for a vehicle with that form factor (2 seater little sports car) but you can't really compare it with a full sized sedan, and note too that it has a tiny battery pack (22 KWh), range is 'unofficial' 300 Km and likely will be adjusted down based on weight/pack size. The four motors together are less than half the rated power of what you'd find in a more conventional (is there such a thing already?) EV. But with that light total weight it will be a zippy little car anyway (most EVs are over-powered for their weight).

Still, very impressive achievement and a nice testbed for this kind of tech, it may also make sense for motorcycles and for vehicles that are not meant for highway use.



What is the advantage of in-wheel motors?


That you save on a whole bunch of linkage and drive train components, four wheel drive without the associated complexity, that you can integrate the wheels, motors and brakes, cleaner airflow under the car and that the system as a whole can be lighter weight than the same package with motors near the centerline of the car, so you get somewhat better range. It also gives more space for batteries and/or more storage space. That's why manufacturers will keep trying to get this done, if they can get it to work cost effectively and without impacting that unsprung weight too much it will give them an advantage.


"cleaner airflow under the car"?

Why should the airflow be cleaner?


Because that's automatically better range, cleaner airflow is less drag. That's why cars have all of those underbody skirts, it improves their mileage (and helps with not fouling up the more sensitive bits).


I think they mean smoother or less turbulent airflow, not cleaner in the sense of less pollution.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: