Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Question, in this case, is it a violation of patents + trade secrets, or just the patents?



The case in the original article is not patents at all. Closer to copyright? Idk if it's actually copyright or some other trade secret law (? sorry, don't know much about non-patent IP law)




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: