Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm exactly the same. I can't understand how one can confuse the two...


For the same reason most people think Vader said "Luke, I am your father."


Because that's exactly what he says?


> Because that's exactly what he says?

Is it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwtaM0GC-js



Not sure if that's fake or what, but it's pretty well established that the actual line is "No, I am your father". Even Lucasfilm acknowledge this, so if you want to argue that everybody else is wrong, I hope you have some serious evidence to back that up.

But ironically, the line is often misquoted: “Luke, I am your father.” In fact, Vader responds to Luke’s claim that he’d killed the young man’s father. “No,” the villain says, “I am your father.”

https://www.lucasfilm.com/news/defining-moments-i-am-your-fa...


Reminds me of a similar misunderstanding in Casablanca, where most people quote the line as "Play it again, Sam". In actual fact, the lines in the film are "Play it once Sam, for old times sake." "Play it, Sam." and "Play it again" (without Sam).


Another very well known misquote is "Beam me up, Scotty".


The sound in that clip was doctored. One of the comments mentions from which other part of the film the word Luke is clipped from.


No, I am your daddy.


Hola Papi!!


Easily? It's a minor detail, extremely easy to miss the point in the briefing animation, and extremely easy to not remember the size of the equatorial trench hangars.

Both the equatorial one and the actual one being trenches, and the equatorial one being more prominent makes it even easier...

It's more something a BBC Sherlock-type would notice, than a regular viewer...


It also follows ordinary narrative convention more closely. We can tell from distant shots of the Death Star that there’s an equatorial trench, but not other trenches. If you’ve already introduced a trench, conventionally you’d just use that if you need a trench. The difference between a narrative and just a bunch of stuff happening is precisely that kind of re-use and tying-together of elements.


Agreed 100%: see also Checkov's Gun and Keith Johnstone's "Impro".


Exactly. And, to be clear, this is a pretty minor violation of that principle of favoring re-use of elements, and it’s also not the case that violating it’s always a mistake. I just think it’s (along with some other cues) why a lot of people assumed it was the equatorial trench. We knew of one trench, and it hadn’t really served any trench-related purpose yet, so… why wouldn’t it be that one?


Idk, they do clearly fly into the equatorial trench the first time we see the Death Star, and it is clearly very, very wide.

I never paid attention to the briefing graphic which showed it was a longitudinal trench, so in my head canon it was always lateral. But not the equatorial trench. I'm also a bit dumbfounded that misunderstanding is/was so common.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: