And this, kids, is the bridge that takes libertarianism from "force and fraud are wrong" to "but luckily there's no such thing as force or fraud when I do it".
Libertarianism only seems likely to work in two cases:
1. Small societies where everyone has skills or resources that are essential to the others, or
2. Societies where everyone has resources to be self-sufficient.
There may also be a requirement that the society not be in competition with outside, non-libertarian societies for necessary resources, because libertarianism is poor at handling negative externalities. A non-libertarian society has the option of careful government regulation which allows better utilization of important natural resources.
You need to define your terms, namely "libertarianism" and "work." I assume you mean right-libertarianism, something like anarcho-capitalism or perhaps minarchism. By a society "working," you could mean scores of things, from maximizing personal happiness, to raising the minimum personal happiness, to maximizing average income, to maximizing socioeconomic equality, etc. Do you consider any modern or past society as "working?"
I suspect you don't know much about "libertarianism," or else you just use the term to refer to more moderate positions, like the American Libertarian party. There are libertarians (like Noam Chomsky) who view wage labor as inherently coercive and immoral.
It isn't force. Employees aren't slaves. They can start a business or move onto a company that doesn't ask for any of this info.
This is why the majority of people starting a business, fail. Looking at the comments here, people just give up at the first sign of trouble (or need mommy and daddy government to step in and make decisions on their behalf).
I downvoted you for blatant use of a straw man and an ad hominem attack of pretty much everyone who's disagreed with you by categorically stating that they're all looking for "mommy and daddy".
> "They can start a business or move onto a company that doesn't ask for any of this info."
Riiiiiiight. Because the blacks totally had that choice. And the women! And the Irish! And the Jews! It's kind of weird to me how libertarians model the world so simply - where culture doesn't exist, humans are perfectly rational actors, and all systems are 100% efficient. Real life isn't game theory.
