Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

We knew this about casinos. That's why they were relegated to a little hellish desert town.

What happened that we decided apps somehow solved the problems related to gambling?




The odd difference here is people supposedly do this knowing they can’t win their money back (which is shocking to me). I assume the argument is they’re paying for entertainment.


I can only imagine the boardroom meeting where this idea was first proposed.

"So you're saying it's like a slot machine, except they can't win anything and just give us free money? Are you insane? What kind of idiot would sign up to that?"

Two weeks and a beta test later:

"I'm so sorry I doubted you."


You never got momoney back from pacman yet people spent a lot of money on video games.


>We knew this about casinos. That's why they were relegated to a little hellish desert town.

There are only two states with legal casino style gambling statewide, but most states offer many other ways to gamble legally: lotteries, tribal casinos, racetrack betting, and sports betting are widespread and nearly every state has at least one form of legal gambling. In fact there are only two states where all forms of gambling are outlawed: Hawaii and Utah.


For me, I want to have a little here and there. It's fun, I like putting $20 in with my friends and we get a little pool going.

I don't understand why I can't gamble because someone else has no self control. My same argument applies to alcohol, marijuana, fast food, etc.


For me, yeah, I might have the self control, but I also live in a society. What other people do affects me. For example, I don't want the people with an alcohol problem to have unlimited access to alcohol. I drive on the same roads as them.


Not really a great analogy because someone else’s gambling problem is not going to get you killed on the way home from work.

I would support some kind of rule where you can’t generate more than $1,000 / yr or something off the same user. Does that change the entire economics of the social game industry? Yes, that’s the point.


How do you feel about gun control?

Should we prevent people from owning guns because _some people_ like harming themselves and/or others?


You can’t really kill someone else with casino chips, unless you tried really hard. Not everything is black and white, need to consider the context as well.


Yes, famously, gambling has caused zero suicides.


Suicide from gambling and homicide/suicide from gun use are not comparable.


Right, it’s not black and white.

You can cause harm to yourself and others with gambling as well as with guns.

Drawing the line at “you can’t directly kill people with casino chips” is reducing a complicated issue to a black and white stance


Laws, rules are enacted regarding those things all the time. A soda tax to stop kids from getting fat, driving under the influence is a crime.....

As with everything else on this planet, it's all about moderation and the ones that can't help themselves, fuck it up for everyone else.


Addiction isn’t a function of moderation. It is not rational and it is not based in willpower.


Out of sight, out of mind.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: