Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

What is misleading is that nowhere in the press release do they say:

1) this research is weapons research (much less primarily weapons over power research)

2) this research does not currently contend a viable avenue towards breakeven power generation




> DOE Under Secretary for Nuclear Security and NNSA Administrator Jill Hruby said in achieving ignition, LLNL researchers have “opened a new chapter in NNSA’s science-based Stockpile Stewardship Program,” one that enables scientists to modernize nuclear weapons and explore new avenues of research in nuclear science.

> Following Hruby, NNSA Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs Marvin “Marv” Adams showed a NIF target capsule and explained the science behind fusion reactions. Adams said ignition will enhance national security by helping NNSA maintain confidence in the nuclear deterrent, advance the country’s non-proliferation goals and increase national security.

> “The science and technology challenges on the path to fusion energy are daunting but making the seemingly impossible possible is when we're at our very best,” Budil explained. “Ignition is a first step — a truly monumental one that sets the stage for a transformational decade in high energy density science and fusion research — and I cannot wait to see where it takes us.”

> While optimism reigned for the event, Budil cautioned there are still “significant hurdles” and engineering challenges to solve before the commercialization of fusion energy becomes a reality, such as the ability to reproduce ignition many times per minute and making fusion reactions simpler and more efficient.

> “I think it's moving into the foreground and, probably with concerted effort and investment, a few decades of research on the underlying technologies could put us in a position to build a power plant,” Budil said.


> the seemingly impossible possible

Did anyone seriously believe it was impossible to get "q" > 1 fusion by blasting a pellet of hydrogen hard enough?

---

Significant hurdles != "There is not currently a/no known path"

I'm still toning down from "a path is impossible" which ought to be the consensus.

> a few decades of research on the underlying technologies could put us in a position to build a power plant

No.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: