Wikipedia's misogyny is built into its policies, notably the pernicious effects of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOS:IDINFO and how they punish anyone who dissents from this.
So for example, per this policy, it's impossible to rewrite https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Rivers to point out the angle of male violence against women, despite there being sources that exist discussing this, because it's forbidden by policy to refer to this male as a male or use sources that describe him as a man. Instead, the pretence that this is the crime of a woman has to be maintained.
So you think that because wikipedia guidelines are intolerant of intolerance and don't fit with your personal (bigoted) opinions on trans people that means they are misogynist?
So for example, per this policy, it's impossible to rewrite https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Rivers to point out the angle of male violence against women, despite there being sources that exist discussing this, because it's forbidden by policy to refer to this male as a male or use sources that describe him as a man. Instead, the pretence that this is the crime of a woman has to be maintained.