Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think they're measuring "largest" by the number of requests per second.



But that's part of my question. If other botnets have previously been created with many more than 20,000 controlled machines, why has nobody else before orchestrated an attack with so many requests if it only requires 20,000 machines or so to pull off?


This is exploiting a new technique. This technique wasn't known previously, or wasn't viable when HTTP/2 wasn't widespread. This technique is a ~100x multiplier on the impact any size botnet can have. A previous botnet might have needed 20,000,000 machines to achieve the same impact.


Thanks for explaining in such a straightforward way, appreciated!




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: