So we're upvoting conspiracy theories to the top of HN posts now so long as they're anti-crypto? Are you kidding me? Since you're all already entertaining truly unhinged theories, here's a counterpoint [1]. Gordon, one of the founders, is also Jewish.
The documentary is being censored because it is insane conjecture of the same grade as Russian war propaganda.
If it was one similarity it might as well be a coincidence. But it’s not one thing, but dozens which are clearly Nazi-inspired. And they’re very deliberate, e.g. puzzles consisting of many anagrams resulting in something nazi-inspired. This is tough work to plan.
The fact that he’s Jewish is also brought up. I really urge you to continue watching.
This is denial in action. They literally put nazi uniforms on them, use nazi anagrams, nazi symbols, nazi slogans, nazi songs. Let me ask: what would it take for you to stop considering this a coincidence? It sure looks like there is no threshold for you.
I watched this one, and yeah, a lot of these edgie kids are little pricks, but whether or not they're going to Bring About the Coming Race, I frankly don't think the blockchain kids have the balls. The whole shebang is a little weak, but I am open to the idea that they're feeding the Thiel/Palantir/Literal Nazi Vampire complex. I just need some data, not association.
If you're gonna blow an hour or two on NFT YT docs, I'm still recommending Dan Olson's "Line Goes Up" as the go-to. I guess everyone's probably seen that by now, but it's a far less "this guy painted a picture that looks like this other thing" and much more of "yes, Powered By The Blockchain is an awful lot like saying your ship is powered by an anchor chain that gets longer every port and which can't be reeled up.". Dan also does a pretty good job of dialing in the villains, who are, surprise surprise, the same class of fintech a-holes who have driven America into a gulch.
I turned the video off at around the minute mark when he said "dog whistles", a term that culture warriors use when they really want to call someone racist but can't point to a single instance of actually racist remarks.
You admittedly would have 0 idea if any instances of racism were pointed to since you turned it off after a minute due to a single phrase that's exited for a long time being used.
The dog whistle idea has a decent amount of merit with me, but one signal is not enough to call dog whistle on, it's the combination of many.
I see people online with "88" in the username and lo and peep another comment featuring a black sun, later on they're suspended for hate speech. I see people mention "international bankers" and what do you know they're later dropping parentheses around random words and denying the Holocaust.
It's a just a heuristic, it doesn't map to the real world all the time but fairly reliable online. For a crypto group I can totally see this applying.
Nah, not good enough. I've seen people accused of being racist for using "dog whistles" like the "ok hand" emoji or the letter 'H'. It's not a good heuristic, it's a way to accuse people of being racist for no reason.
Given how effective this has been for me I'm going to guess this is actually a selection bias issue.
You're noticing people doing it wrong because when people do it right you don't see anything at all, the accounts just go poof some point later when they're banned for policy violations.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=XpH3O6mnZvw