I'm not sure I'd agree with the interpretation "the scientific name makes the conclusions inaccessible to most readers". It's not that abstruse, and if instead of editorializing the title you had posted a comment to the thread explaining the paper's findings and what's interesting about them, that might have worked fine, and would have stayed within the site rules.
Of course no handful of simple rules can cover the nuances of all cases and I don't mean to say they work perfectly.
Had to think about "homozygosity" for a bit. The science jargon makes my brain turn off. I thought the original title was translating, not editorializing (maybe clickbaity to leave out the [small] effect size).
Of course no handful of simple rules can cover the nuances of all cases and I don't mean to say they work perfectly.