Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> By the definition you give then people who claim benefits and do not work are not “working class”.

Yes, people who do not rely on overwhelmingly on selling labor for their support are not working class (people who are working class might transitionally be on support without working, or might be on support while working, depending on the benefit structure, but if their principal source of support over an extended time is not selling labor, then they aren’t, as a matter of economic class, “working class”.)

Just as someone isn’t part of the capitalist class if over time they do get most of their support from working and don’t have capital holdings. Economic class is a description of how you relate to the economy.

> It is delusional to think our jobs are on the same level as someone who grafts all day with their hands and does back breaking work for minimum wage.

The proletarian class isn’t defined by the nature of labor, but by the fact of selling it as one’s overwhelming-majority means of support within the economy. Yes, there are important differences within the class as well as the broad common features and interests.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: