Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In practice, science is, and has been, rather flexible about its assumptions, and, ironically, has been criticized for that by philosophers - and yet it has been remarkably successful, arguably because it gives a lot of weight to empiricism and not so much to debating axioms.

> We don't know how wide that window happens to be and how much of reality we can see through it... We don't even know if the scientific method is the best it could be in what we use it for.

It is telling that these sentiments are not followed by something beginning "analytical philosophy, in contrast..."

> [Science] was only expanded with the idea of falsification in the 20th century yet we were still doing useful science before than.

It was doing de facto, though somewhat ad hoc, falsification long before Popper focused his attention it. The philosophy of science is much more descriptive than prescriptive.

Having said this, you may be surprised to learn that I spend a some of my free time reading and thinking about various aspects of philosophy. I must say, however, that I feel that western metaphysics lost its way in its attempt to address fundamental questions through the analysis of language.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: