I think my intent is less different from what you stated on how it comes across.
Especially this bit "I’ve worked with people who are so unafraid of being wrong that they can’t be trusted.". Hopefully the article doesn't come across as "be mindless" in the workplace. In fact in the conclusions I state that this is no substitute for hard work and thinking critically.
> "first construct a hypothetically ideal workplace and then explain how to operate"
I don't think this is what I stated but I know it wasn't the intent. Hopefully, working on a psychologically safe workplace isn't hypothetically ideal.
I'm definitely learning a few tricks on what I should be clearer by reading the comments though so thank you.
Especially this bit "I’ve worked with people who are so unafraid of being wrong that they can’t be trusted.". Hopefully the article doesn't come across as "be mindless" in the workplace. In fact in the conclusions I state that this is no substitute for hard work and thinking critically.
> "first construct a hypothetically ideal workplace and then explain how to operate"
I don't think this is what I stated but I know it wasn't the intent. Hopefully, working on a psychologically safe workplace isn't hypothetically ideal.
I'm definitely learning a few tricks on what I should be clearer by reading the comments though so thank you.