> "out of context" is the standard BS answer to anything.
You are completely wrong on this one. People routinely take things out of context on purpose to defame others. Thats so common I am surprised you can make the opposite claim.
Why do you expect anyone here to answer you? You're not the judge, and presumably no one posting in this thread is an attorney representing Google in this case.
why do I expect anyone to answer? They said, "out of context" as if there's some broader context that would put it in a different light. OK, what is it?
Otherwise, it's just empty legal boilerplate, i.e. performance art.
You are completely wrong on this one. People routinely take things out of context on purpose to defame others. Thats so common I am surprised you can make the opposite claim.