> Omitting the bad technique is tantamount to glorification.

The reason I left it out is not because I want to "glorify" him but rather that I have no specific knowledge of his "bad technique". All I know is that he had a reputation for being an asshole. I have no reason to doubt that this reputation was well deserved, but I don't have any specific knowledge one way or the other.

> The language in your posts is also very...enthusiastic?

I have no idea what that means. What does "un-enthusaistic" language look like?