That's a hallucination. Here's a similar made-up answer:

https://g.co/bard/share/9ce2e6a11e83

LLM's aren't trained on their own documentation, and can't introspect, so generally can't answer questions like this.

(`"Mark House" "Bard"` gives no results on Google.)

Okay, so the entire point of the comment is "A current model which does well used to be bad!"

With all due respect, is that a valuable thing to say? Isn't it true of them all?

Mhh not just about the past, you can see such in current answers from Bard.

They are generally okayish, closer to "meh", than something outstanding.

Yes the shell script solution is better, it doesn't give rm -f anymore, but is still somewhat closer to a bad solution instead of just giving rm -i.

I'm just really happy and excited to see that a free-to-download and free-to-use model can beat a commercially-hosted offering.

This is what has brought the most amazing projects (e.g. Stable Diffusion)

Isn't the model STILL doing bad if it needs to present a hard-coded answer?