Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

$15.88 per .com is pretty steep, damn. Dynadot shows $10.99 per renewal.

How legitimate is the Namecheap claim about "its out of our control" part? I have a number of domains with Namecheap, enough to be an annoyance to transfer them all but that number seems excessively high.



Porkbun has an excellent price comparison page for .com: https://porkbun.com/tld/com

They're still at $9.73 for both registration and renewal.


It's worth going directly to the source of Porkbun's data, especially if you're trying to broadly compare domain prices: https://tld-list.com


The upstream cost increase is 7% (the maximum allowed by Verisign's contract). Verisign is allowed to increase .com prices by up to 7% next year, and likely will.


It's $5 over a year. If that's a meaningful amount of money you probably have no business owning domain names.

Namecheap has always been good for me in terms of service and reliability. I only own a few domains but if $15/year was unaffordable I think I'd just let them expire.


> It's $5 over a year. If that's a meaningful amount of money you probably have no business owning domain names.

I don't think you have a say on what others do with their money, or what could have possibly led you to believe you had.

I've bought domains for my employer before. Domain name pricing was absolutely a factor in the decision-making process. Only a moron pays $20 for something they could pay $10 instead.


Everybody here can express an opinion on any topic under discussion; it's a public forum.

I might say only a moron spends 10 seconds of his employer's time worrying about a $5 difference in an expense over the course of a year. At that cost differential, many other factors are more important than price.


> Everybody here can express an opinion on any topic under discussion; it's a public forum.

I've expressed mine, and my opinion is that it's stupid for anyone to make wild claims on how anyone can or cannot base their decision to buy domain names based on price, and argue that they should be deprived of their right just because they are price-conscious.

Do you disagree?

> I might say only a moron spends 10 seconds (...)

Only a moron buys domain names without assessing their availability, and this also covers variants including based on TLDs. A company does not simply buy example.com while leaving out typosquatter variants like example.org, example.xyz, example.io, example.co.uk, etc. If you had any experience in the domain, you would know that all it takes is a domain squatter to turn your 5$/year domain into a >10k expense.


> Do you disagree?

Yes. No wild claims were made. Arguing over 5$ a year is silly and that's an equally valid opinion.

> argue that they should be deprived of their right

Another of your wholly invented strawmen.

> all it takes is a domain squatter to turn your 5$/year domain into a >10k expense

Irrelevant strawman. A squatter can take a single domain and say it costs 10k. This has nothing to do with the subject.


I am not a business, I'm an individual with limited funds. The cost factor is pretty important here.


What if you are not a business?


Steep? .com used to be $100 for two years. That was the registrar price. It's cheap now to me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: