I mean a more deatailed comparison, not just he full text of the book but gather up however many hundreds of articles have been published too; and then do a textual analysis to see just how much variance there can be.
if my use of the word "amusing" offends; i apologize; I am not a sensitive person in that way and frequently do that. Nothing about this tragedy is amusing.
The predicable banal venality of people's responses, on the other hand, is. If you can't laugh at people jumping to profit of tragedy like the author of this book, what can you do? Despair?