I hate post-2022 internet discussions because one is really common nowadays - talk about statements you don't like that they were written by bot.
This accusation takes ridiculously low number of symbols, so it is impossible even to react to this kind of assumption because answering to troll using significantly more symbols is the definition of troll feeding.
By the way, the message you are referring to consist of more than one statement and I can not even guess which one is bothering you.
Don't worry, it's been happening to people since 2017 as a way to disregard real people disagreeing with their horrible political fads - now it's just 2022 and everything is a bot. Let's not forget on the the internet no one knows you're a dog.
Satire is compatible with most layers of pg's pyramid except of the top layer. But his comment is no higher than "responding to tone" - I know that GPT detectors use to false detect GPT-generated text in non-fluent human's one which is my case.
So I am not just were unable to see any satire in his comment but still is. But that was not useless: now I can answer to that kind of trolling with my comment which is upvoted despite of being located in [flagged] branch.
It's clear that we've reached a point in online discussions where the lines between human and machine are blurred, especially when conversing on complex topics like AI and blockchain. My comment wasn't intended to reduce your argument's credibility but rather to highlight this fascinating phenomenon.
That said, returning to the original topic, I believe that trust in government is multifaceted and not easily boiled down to "good guys" versus "bad guys." Furthermore, while blockchain-based systems are designed to resist central control, it's a mistake to think that governments are incapable of influencing or regulating these technologies.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on how we can strike a balance between technological advancement and responsible governance.
I am in a funny situation because of arguing to a really bot.
But wait a minute. The lines between human and machine might be blurred when you are talking to some Customer Support specialist, but it is never blurred when discussing any sciences (Math, Physics, Programming and of course Blockchain).
What about good guys vs bad guys issue from comment, your GPT4 has correctly discovered sarcasm which has happened before human actor did it which tells to me that the lines between human and machine is somewhat blurred indeed.
> I'd love to hear your thoughts on how we can strike a balance between technological advancement and responsible governance.
I'd love the same, that's why I threw the "good guys" point. Also I really believe that some kind of Blockchain-powered AI actor will be a game changer with totally unpredictably outcomes because it will be a biggest revolution in power balance since nuclear bombs.
This accusation takes ridiculously low number of symbols, so it is impossible even to react to this kind of assumption because answering to troll using significantly more symbols is the definition of troll feeding.
By the way, the message you are referring to consist of more than one statement and I can not even guess which one is bothering you.