> Everyone agreed that it was not just a major improvement, but actually the best option out of all the contenders out there.
Wikipedia tells me the first of four parts of the jpeg xl standard was finalized less than two years ago, and the last part (barely) less than a year ago.
The idea that
a) browsers are bad if they're not adding a year-old image format to the web forever and
b) "everyone" knows what they're talking about with an image codec finalized less than a year ago
Wikipedia tells me the first of four parts of the jpeg xl standard was finalized less than two years ago, and the last part (barely) less than a year ago.
The idea that
a) browsers are bad if they're not adding a year-old image format to the web forever and
b) "everyone" knows what they're talking about with an image codec finalized less than a year ago
is pretty ludicrous.
It's a good format, it'll gain adoption.