I wasn't implying anything; rather, I've just seen various forms of "if you exclude drunk/high/etc. drivers then they are more dangerous" repeated multiple times in different comments. Curious where that was coming from.
> ...it's the people developing and profiting from the new tech that have the burden to show that it's safe.
Is there a reason to believe this hasn't happened? I don't know the process involved in approving an autonomous system but I'm guessing they showed some convincing data to regulators.
I wasn't implying anything; rather, I've just seen various forms of "if you exclude drunk/high/etc. drivers then they are more dangerous" repeated multiple times in different comments. Curious where that was coming from.
> ...it's the people developing and profiting from the new tech that have the burden to show that it's safe.
Is there a reason to believe this hasn't happened? I don't know the process involved in approving an autonomous system but I'm guessing they showed some convincing data to regulators.