Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think the clearest evidence is Microsofts paper where they show abilities at various stages during training[1]... But in a talk [2], they give more details... The unicorn gets worse during the finetuning process.

[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbIk7-JPB2c&t=1392s

[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712




Thanks, that’s interesting.

Noobie follow up question: Should we put any trust into “Sparks of intelligence” I thought it was regarded as a Microsoft marketing piece, not a serious paper.


The data presented is true... The text might be rather exaggerated/unscientific/marketing...

Also notable that the team behind that paper wasn't involved in designing/building the model, but they did get access to prerelease versions.


I don’t trust it because enough third parties were able to verify the findings.

This is the double edge sword of being so ridiculously closed.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: