Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Pretty much. It was rather shocking to me that Twitter was so thoroughly broken by rate-limits and the login gate that it was easier to get updates about Twitter on Mastodon than on Twitter itself.



I was on holidays that week and I didn't even noticed the drama. Is Twitter then doing just fine?

Looks like Twitter is just easy to bash nowadays, I'm not that a big user but I see, especially in the OSS / computer related profiles a lot of people putting their Mastodon address in the nickname and yet still tweeting, retweeting, liking in the same compulsory manner as they did before.


Unregistered users can't view user profiles any more. Tweet embedding works again. I would not call that "just fine".


I just checked out a tweet in an private window. Looks like that works as well just like before.


Unregistered users can't view user profiles. That worked before. This means that apps like fritter don't work any more.


Sorry, misread the "user profile" part, I thought it was the lone linked tweet/thread


I was also never that big of a Twitter user, and it's my observation that my former Twitter-using acquaintances bemoan that Twitter's use as a social space has pretty much died. They still use it, but only as a glorified RSS feed.

Most of them don't like Mastodon either due to not liking defederation drama, but instead they moved their socializing to Discord and Instagram, with a few chomping at the bit to get into BlueSky.

For what it's worth, this is a trend I observed long before Twitter introduced rate-limiting and the login gate, it just made it much worse. Ironically, clicking through on Twitter links other people posted was the one use case I ever visited the site for, and now that that doesn't work I simply rely on the vxtwitter summary or a screenshot.


I'm on Mastodon (et al) and I did often go back to Twitter to check on things.

But now they blocked checking things when not logged in, inertia has set in and I cannot even bothered to make the effort and don't feel like I've lost anything. Even for those accounts I followed.

I just think of paid blue checks spouting off nonsense while paying to do so and think to myself: "No ... that's not the bullshit I want to consume. I preferred the relatively democratic bullshit from before"

... and then I think: "Let's just cut the bullshit"

It is a shame, as it was entertaining.


I think that bullshitting is just part of human nature (or at least of the current global society/ies). You just need a critical mass to see it properly. When a community/social network is small, it's either bullshit free or completely full of bullshit. When it's big enough, the bullshit quantity will converge regardless the initial value.


I'm calling bullshit.

Hasn't answered yet.


To what should I answer? To what people you know do on Twitter? I stand by my opinion: the platform doesn't have a word in the bullshitting level, unless it strictly moderates the content in a way that would be basically dictatorial.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: