Yeah I just wanted to make sure everyone had the whole story. I certainly understand why it happens (I wasn't mad or anything) and how articles get trimmed down often outside the writer's control.
I just didn't want people to think we'd never ever take money. For angel funding you often don't need a model and sometimes don't need a deck. Rest of the article was great (even if the picture was a bit embarassing :-D). The other clarification points were for the Hacker News headline (I didn't want people to think revenue or profits were growing 50% per month), the picture (ha) and to expand on points made within the article.
Nothing tops this picture, however: http://is.gd/7yx4
(This one was at Tom's expense instead of mine)
I just didn't want people to think we'd never ever take money. For angel funding you often don't need a model and sometimes don't need a deck. Rest of the article was great (even if the picture was a bit embarassing :-D). The other clarification points were for the Hacker News headline (I didn't want people to think revenue or profits were growing 50% per month), the picture (ha) and to expand on points made within the article.
Nothing tops this picture, however: http://is.gd/7yx4 (This one was at Tom's expense instead of mine)