Per the article, the didn't just use the static detector:
They also extracted the workers’ keystrokes in a bid to work out whether they’d copied and pasted their answers, an indicator that they’d generated their responses elsewhere.
So while I don't yet know if the article is bunk -- I do know that your hot take is bunk.
They also extracted the workers’ keystrokes in a bid to work out whether they’d copied and pasted their answers, an indicator that they’d generated their responses elsewhere.
So while I don't yet know if the article is bunk -- I do know that your hot take is bunk.