Wait - if twin studies showed bellow 50% correlation, how can it be pre-natal environment ?
But you make a stronger point in the footnote, his initial argument relies on group selection and can be dismissed on those grounds, no need to debate how that relates to homosexuality.
Wait - if twin studies showed bellow 50% correlation, how can it be pre-natal environment ?
But you make a stronger point in the footnote, his initial argument relies on group selection and can be dismissed on those grounds, no need to debate how that relates to homosexuality.