Nah, GPT's output can be very valuable and insightful. But you don't get it with a low effort "please summarize the key points of the text below\n\n{paste some text here}".
I propose the rule to be what it is already: put some effort into your comment, make it add something instead of just taking space and attention. This works for human and GPT and human/GPT ensemble commentary. And the prescription for low-effort spam? Downvote and flag.
Most everyone seems to have missed the point, of the copy paste.
My goal was to show how trivial it would have been for the CEO to have typed that into chat gpt and avoided the injury of unforced errors. Sort of a modern “let me google that for you.”
I had this written out for the comment but at the time couldn’t make my explanation add more to the simple provision of “what you get when you try this using present tech” and a simple prompt and response.
Another way to look at it is that LLM queries and their responses serve almost like ultra niche links to the docs except their responses vary and may even be transient.
If you didn't write it, don't post it.