Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think the author of the article misunderstood.

In the article the words "a filing" link to attachment 1 to docket entry 4, titled "Text of Proposed Order"

Further the docket indicates that sometime today (Wednesday) the court scheduled a hearing on the 13th to consider this motion (docket entry 4).

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67474542/securities-and...

As tedunangst says below, this is common and doesn't mean the judge agreed with you.

It just makes it procedurally easy for the judge to agree with you. The judge might not sign it at all. Might edit it and then sign it. Might write their own version that says something else. Etc.



Yeah, looks like you are correct.

I only checked that the title matched the contents of the article, not that the article was correctly researched.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: